Guest-written Papers
Reference Abbreviations
Guidance Articles for Researchers
Single Family Analysis
Families of Mixed Origin
Family Pedigrees
Mis-identified Same-Named People in Wales
Battles and Historical Events
Ancient Welsh Territories
Welshmen in Llydaw, Brittany
The Men of the North
Legendary History Prior to 1st Century BC
Beli Mawr and Llyr Llediath in Welsh Pedigrees
Papers Related to Maxen Wledig
Bartrum's "Pedigrees of the Welsh Tribal Patriarchs"
Britain's Royal Roman Family
The Royal Family of Powys
2nd Powys Royal Dynasty
The Royal Family of Gwynedd
Men Descended from Tudwal Gloff
Royal Family of Gwent/ Glamorgan
Royal Family of Brycheiniog
15 Noble Tribes of Gwynedd
The 5 Plebian Tribes of Wales
Glast and the Glastening
Papers about Rhiryd Flaidd and Penllyn
The Men of Collwyn ap Tangno of Lleyn
Edwin of Tegeingl and his Family
Ednowain Bendew in Welsh pedigrees
Ithel of Bryn in Powys
Idnerth Benfras of Maesbrook
Tudor Trefor and his Family
Trahaearn ap Caradog of Arwystli
The Family of Trahaearn ap Caradog
Cadafael Ynfyd of Cydewain
Maredudd ap Owain, King of Deheubarth
Sandde Hardd of Mortyn
The Floruit of Einion ap Seisyllt
The 5 Dafydd Llwyds of Llanwrin Parish
Cowryd ap Cadfan of Dyffryn Clwyd
Osbwrn Wyddel of Cors Gedol
Bradwen of Llys Bradwen in Meirionydd
Who Was Sir Robert Pounderling?
Sir Aaron ap Rhys
Eidio Wyllt - What Was His Birthname?
Ifor Bach, Lord of Senghenydd
Ancestors and Children of the Lord Rhys
                                           By Darrell Wolcott
         Since the role of king of a Celtic tribe required a man capable of defending its territory, and since the rule of primogeniture was not practiced, the Welsh kingdoms did not recognize child kings.  But at what age was an otherwise eligible heir deemed old enough to become the king?
          All we are told in the old laws of Hywel Dda is that a son of noble birth, on his 14th birthday, was sent by his father to his "lord" who thereafter was responsible for the boy's education and maintenance.[1]  We also find that the son does not receive a share of his family lands until his father dies, at which point he ascends to his father's status as an uchelwr...a land-owning nobleman.  We are not told of any earlier point where the young man becomes free to leave the bed and board of the lord and establish an independent household.
           The manuscript[2] which alleges that at age 21, a man is entitled to land from his lord in exchange for his military service is of medieval authorship; it may refer to knight's fees granted by the Norman feudal system, but is of no assistance in determining the law or custom of eleventh century Wales.  Our examination of actual examples, while anecdotal rather than written evidence, shows men did not take a wife and begin a family while their father was still alive.[3]  We have thus assumed young men were still in service to the lord until they ascended to the privileges of their father.
          The only evidence seen in the old laws that sons of the ruling or royal family were treated differently is found in the "edling", the young man declared next to rule after the present king.  That boy, whether a son or nephew of the king, was an official member of the king's household.  But this "heir apparent" did not always succeed to the kingship immediately upon the king's death, although he might have later on when he attained "full age".   If no eligible successor was yet of the required age, the leading men of the tribe named an interim king...typically a man maternally related to the royal family.[4]
         We begin assembling our anecdotal evidence with the death of Llewelyn ap Seisyllt in 1023.  It appears that an interim king had to be chosen to rule Powys and Gwynedd.  His son, Gruffudd, was yet a child and his mother remarried Cynfyn ap Gwerystan.  By 1033, a representive of the royal family in Gwynedd reclaimed it's kingship in the person of Iago ap Idwal.  And Gruffudd ap Llewelyn became king of Powys in 1039.  Our question is why those years?  Did they perhaps represent the earliest either man had attained the requisite age to become king?
         Our reconstruction of the timeline for the pedigrees of the Gwynedd and Powys families points to a birthdate c. 1005 for Iago and 1011 for Gruffudd.  Admittedly either date might vary a couple years, but both men appear to have ascended to kingship around age 26/30 and certainly not as young as age 21.
          Gruffudd would likely have taken a wife shortly after becoming king, bearing children by 1040/41. When he was killed in 1063, he left sons Ithel and Maredudd.  But neither of those sons staked a claim to his kingdom until 1069.  Again, were they forced to wait until the elder of them had attained a minimum age?  Even then, was it particularly wise for them to challenge Rhiwallon and Bleddyn, the sons of Cynfyn who in 1063 had divided Powys and Gwynedd between them with the blessing of King Edward the Confessor?
          Cynan, son of Iago, would have (under our timeline) attained full age about 1063. Is it only a coincidence that was the year Gruffudd ap Llewelyn was killed, or was Cynan required to act then if he wanted to restore rule of Gwynedd to his lineage?  Certain Irish annals actually name him as Gruffudd's killer.[5]  In any event, we are told the sons of Cynfyn took rule in both Powys and Gwynedd; any reign of Cynan was short indeed.
          One could posit from the examples of Iago, Gruffudd, the sons of Gruffudd and the son of Iago, that not only was an heir required to attain a minimum age to become king, say 28,  but was actually required to stake his claim at that time or forfeit his right.  We cite other examples which tend to support this requirement in our paper relating to Gruffudd ap Cynan in the eleventh century.[6]
          An incident wholly unexplained by modern historians occurred in 1042 when the Brut noted that Gruffudd ap Llewelyn was "captured" by the "men of Dublin".  Two years later, he is reported attacking Hywel ap Edwin and killing him; clearly his confinement was brief and did not affect his ability to retain and expand his kingdom. We would note that when Gruffudd took power in 1039 by killing Iago ap Idwal of Gwynedd, a surviving member of that family named Cynan fled to Ireland.  If that man attained "full age" in 1042, could the Brut entry be a record of his attempt to remove Gruffudd and restore Gwynedd to its dynastic family?  If so, his coup was short-lived.  Unfortunately, history is silent as to why Gruffudd was seized or how he escaped. But the timeline we posit for the Gwynedd family does include a Cynan brother of Iago born c. 1014.[7]
        It is not our purpose here to argue that age 28 was precisely the time a man attained "full age", but we have selected that number as both fitting the approximate age when rightful heirs staked their claim and one other consideration: for the first 14 years of his life, a male was considered a child; perhaps the next 14 years was devoted to his education and training under his lord. Only when that apprenticeship was completed, we suspect, was he eligible to wield the powers of kingship.
[1]  Aneurin Owen "Ancient Laws and Institutes of Wales", 1841, vol i, pp 203
[2]  ibid vol ii, pp 211 the "Anomalous Laws" attributed to the 16th century
[3]  See "Generational Gaps and the Welsh Laws" at the link below:
[4]  Examples include: Cadafael ap Cynfeddw who succeeded Cadwallon ap Cadfan in 634 when Cadwaladr ap Cadwallon was a yet a child, and who may have been the son of Cadfan's sister; and Cynfyn ap Gwerystan who succeeded Llewelyn ap Seisyllt in 1023 when Gruffudd ap Llewelyn was underage, and who was maternal grandson of former king Cadell ap Brochwel.
[5]  Annals of Loch Ce and Annals of Ulster call Gruffud's killer "son of Iacoib" while British Library Ms Add. 30512 (an Armagh manuscript) says "Channan mac Iacco"
[6] See "History of Gruffudd ap Cynan - A New Perspective" at the link below:
[7] ibid, we posit a Cynan ap Idwal born c. 1014 as a brother of Iago ap Idwal and as father to "Gruffudd nephew of Iago"