PASGEN "ap URIEN RHEGED", LORD OF GOWER
By Darrell Wolcott
An number of families
in southern Carmarthenshire, including Rice of Newton[1], Bowen of Llangyndeyrn in Cedweli[2], Sir Dafydd ap Gwalter, parson
of Llanedi[3], and Elidyr ap Llywarch of Abergwili[4] claim descent from Urien Rheged through his son, Pasgen. The best known of these is the Rice family, whose name comes from Sir Rhys ap Thomas, the
latter having been a powerful ally of Henry Tudor at the battle of Bosworth. A twelfth-century ancestor of that family
assumed the surname "fitz Urien", being convinced he descended from Urien Rheged ap Cynfarch Oer of the Men of the North.
Local lore claims that Urien came to Gower in the sixth century, displaced the Irish Deisi and built his castle at Is Cennen.
Others say it was Urien's son, Pasgen, who when forced by the Saxons to leave north Britain, resettled in Gower c. 593.[5]
After his laborous work
on Welsh pedigrees, Peter Bartrum concluded the Pasgen of Gower in the pedigree material must have been born c. 850 and was
simply mistaken for the much earlier man of that name.[6] Our studies led to the same conclusion, but pointed to other
data which might explain the early tales of a man forced from his lands "in the north" who relocated in Gower.
We think the same Pasgen
appears in the pedigrees cited for Collwyn ap Tangno, Marchweithian and Nefydd Hardd, all associated with Gwynedd.
Those citations trace upwards to a "Lludd ap Llew ap Llymidod Angel ap Pasgen". Those of Marchweithian and the Rice
family make their Pasgen "ap Owain ap Urien Rheged", while those of Collwyn and Elidyr ap Llywarch omit Owain to say "Pasgen
ap Urien Rheged". A chart of the putative "sons" of Pasgen appears thusly:
850 Pasgen
__________________l_______________________
l
l
l
880 Llyminod angel 880
Gwgan ceneu menrud 885 Mor*
*Possibly this son of
Pasgen was named Ynyr, whose son was Mor. The citations conflict, but either is chronologically possible
Leaving the Gwynedd families
descended from Llyminod for last, we begin our discussion with the two sons whose eleventh-century descendants are found in
or near Gower.
880 Gwgan ceneu menrud*
l
910 Llowarch
l
945 Mor
l
975 Bleddri
l
1005 Llywarch Elystan Glodrydd 985
l
l
1040 Elidyr Cadwgan 1020
l
l
1070 Ellelw========Llewelyn 1055
l
1085
Seisyllt of Buellt
*This pedigree is found in Jesus College Ms 20, 33 & 34
The pedigree does not cite the
ancestry of Seisyllt ap Llewelyn, but the man of that name who held Buellt in the early 12th century was descended from Elystan
Glodrydd as indicated by us. There are problems with other parts of the citation, however. It's author gratutiously
adds that Gwgan was slain at Abergwili together with Llewelyn ap Seisyllt, father of Gruffudd ap Llewelyn. Bartrum correctly
notes that the Gwgan in this pedigree could not have been contemporary with Llewelyn ap Seisyllt who was slain in 1023, although
both could have fought at Abergwili at different times. But the main question raised by the pedigree is whether Gwgan was
nicknamed "ceneu menrud" (Bartrum translates it "the whelp with the red neck") who (the citation continues) "had a serpent
for a year about his neck". Or whether Ceneu menrud refers to the name of his father; in giving the ancestry earlier
than Gwgan, the citation simply reads "Ceneu menrud ap Pasgen ap Urien Rheged ap Cynfarch" etc. If it were necessary to include an extra generation in our chart, one could still make it compatable
with a Pasgen born c. 850 by redating the ensuing men so that Ellelw occurs c. 1115 and re-identifying the man she married
as Llewelyn ap Moreiddig Warwin who also had a son named Seisyllt. He was Lord of Cantref Selyf in Brycheiniog
which adjoins Buellt, but the citation's author may have gratutiously added "of Buellt" just as he added the false connection
to Llewelyn ap Seisyllt. Perhaps it is merely a coincidence that Moreiddig Warwin is also said to have been born
with a snake wrapped around his neck. The alternate pedigree might look like this:
850
Pasgen
l
885
Ceneu menrud
l
920 Gwgan
l
955 Llowarch
l
990 Mor
l
1020 Bleddri Maenyrch 1015
l l
1055 Llywarch Trwmbaenog* 1050
l l
1085
Elidyr Moreiddig Warwin 1080
l l
1120 Ellelw======Llewelyn 1110
l
1140
Seisyllt
*Brother of Bleddyn ap
Maenyrch, last king of Brycheiniog, slain in 1093
The Seisyllt in this chart
had a daughter, Elisabeth, who married Sir Elidyr Ddu of another family descended from Pasgen[7]. While that might seem
to favor this alternate descent for Ellelw, others[8] say Llewelyn ap Moreiddig married a different lady. We prefer
the first chart making Gwgan the same person as ceneu menrud since the required generational gaps in the second chart
are somewhat suspect (Ellelw is moved about 45 years forward, not just one standard generation, to chronologically fit the
alternate marriage). Either way, the Pasgen at the top of her pedigree occurs c. 850.
When we turn to Mor ap Pasgen, we
find attempts have been made to lengthen the pedigree with the insertion of 6 or 7 extra generations between Mor ap Pasgen
and his descendant Einion ap Llywarch. Either the authors of those versions of the pedigree were trying vainly to push
Pasgen back to the 6th century (even 7 more generations would only redate him to c. 625) or more likely, was done to compensate
for 5 generations we find missing between 1065 and 1345 in the Rice family pedigree. In Bartrum's work, he dates
the Einion ap Llywarch of that line to c. 1150, while we put that man nearer c. 1005. This chart shows the differences
down to that man:
850 Pasgen 850
Pasgen
l
l
885 Ynyr*
885 Mor
l
l
915 Mor
920 Rhiryd
l
l
945
Rhiryd 950 Llywarch
l
l
975
Llywarch 985 Rhun
l
l
1005
Einion 1015 Seisyllt
l
1050 Gwrwared
l
1080 Cynhaethwy
l
1115 Llywarch
l
1150 Einion
*Should we omit Ynyr
as does the other line, it would take an average 38 year generation gap to reach Einion near c. 1000. We opt for his
inclusion.
The pedigree is the first
column is cited in many manuscripts in the Peniarth collection[9] while the expanded version on the right appears in fewer
sources[10]. Working from the latter group, we find marriage matches cited which wholly defy the chronology accepted
by Bartrum but work well with the shorter version. These include:
1. Gronwy ap Einion
married Llewelydd ferch Einion Clud. The latter was a son of Madog ap Idnerth ap Cadwgan ap Elystan Glodrydd and his
obituary is recorded in 1177. He would occur c. 1115 and his daughter c. 1145. One should expect Gronwy to date
from c. 1130
2. Rhys (in the pedigree,
ap Gronwy) is said to have married a daughter of Gruffudd ap Cydrych ap Gwaethfoed. However, the Rice family pedigree[11]
also says the mother of that daughter was a daughter of Hywel, Lord of Caerleon. The pedigree of the latter family
says a daughter of Hywel named Gwenllian married Gwilym ap Aeddan, not Gruffudd ap Cydrych. In any event, a daughter
of Hywel would occur c. 1185 and her daughter c. 1205. That Rhys should then occur c. 1195 If a second Rhys
in this family DID marry a daughter of Gruffudd ap Cydrych, he would occur c. 1075
3. Elidyr (in the pedigree,
ap Rhys) is said to have married Gwladys ferch Philip ap Bah ap Gwaethfoed. This is the second Gwaethfoed of Gwent and
Gwladys would have been born c. 1235. The Elidyr she married should occur near 1225.
4. Sir Elidyr (in the
pedigree, ap Elidyr) married Elisabeth ferch Seisyllt ap Llewelyn ap Moreiddig Warwin. She would occur c. 1175, requiring
a husband born c. 1165. Sir Elidyr, according to the same pedigrees, was a Knight of the Sepulchre who joined Richard
the Lionhearted on his crusade in 1191. This also fits a man born c. 1165
5. Philip ap Elidyr
married Gwladys ferch Dafydd Fras, a man who occurs 7th after Cadifor Fawr, the latter born c. 1030. We would date
her to c. 1295 and Philip to c. 1285
6. Nicholas ap Philip
married Sioned ferch Gruffudd ap Llewelyn Foethys; the latter occurs 10 generations after Elystan Glodrydd; we date him to
c. 1330 and his daughter to c. 1365. Thus Nicholas should occur c. 1355
7. Gruffudd ap Nicholas
is a well-known personage who occurs in 1441 and 1451, and was grandfather to Sir Rhys ap Thomas. The latter was
born in 1449 and we date Gruffudd to c. 1385
When we present
a chart based upon the pedigree which dates Einion ap Llywarch to c. 1150, we can see the absurdities:
1150
Einion===not cited
l
1180
Gronwy===Llewelydd 1145
l
1215 Rhys===grandaughter of Hywel 1205
l
or daughter of Gruffudd 1095
l
1250 Elidyr===Gwladys 1235
l
1285 Sir Elidyr===Elisabeth 1175
l
1320 Philip===Gwladys 1295
l
1355 Nicholas (the first generation which fits)
l
1385 Gruffudd
l
1415 Thomas
l
1449 Sir Rhys
Our attempts to make
chronological sense of the pedigree led us to the conclusion that only the shorter version of the pedigree of Einion ap Llywarch
will work, the one which dates him to c. 1005:
1005 Einion===not cited
l
1035 Gronwy===cited for wrong Gronwy
l
1065 Rhys===dau of Gruffudd 1075
l
1095
*Einion===not cited
l
1130 *Gronwy===Llewelydd 1145
l
1165 *Sir Elidyr===Elisabeth 1175
l
1195 *Rhys===lady born 1205
l
1225 Elidyr===Gwladys 1235
l
1255
Elidyr Ddu==not cited
l
1285 Philip===Gwladys 1295
l
1320 *Philip===not cited
l
1355 Nicholas (as above)
*Names not included in that
pedigree material which extends the family back to Pasgen, but the names do occur in pedigrees from families of men who
married daughters of all men in our pedigree after c. 1100, including the second Philip. That generation is essential
to any timeline, including ours, to connect the first Philip to Nicholas. It is cited in an 1896 work by a descendant
of Sir Rhys ap Thomas. [12] Also, the wife of a Brychieniog man born c. 1360 is cited in Peniarth Ms 156 as "Arddun
ferch Philip ap Elidyr" but only a Philip ap Philip at Elidyr would chronologically match with her.
We will conclude our comments on the Carmarthenshire/Gower families who claim descent from Pasgen ap Urien Rheged by
mentioning a Cedwili family who married into that descended from Einion ap Llywarch. The Gwyn family of Gwempa cast
a pedigree[13] showing an Einion, whom it calls Einion ap Llywarch, had sons named Lleison, Rhys, Gronwy and Llywarch.
Unfortunately, about 200 years is missing from their chart and we'd hesitate to date those brothers from data given there.
But we suspect their Einion was the one we date to c. 1095 and not Einion ap Llywarch.